Monday, August 31, 2009
Final Thoughts
well firstly i was wrong about it being a ward setting. it was outpatient parkinsons so i was working in day hospital with scheduled appointments. I was working alongside OT's so i got to see a fair bit of what they do. the placement got a bit repetitive at times and there were several cancellations which meant i had a lot of free time on my hands. good to learn a lot about PD but i think i prefer working on a ward or something with a bit more variety. i was really excited going into the placement and there were some positive aspects but it possibly wasnt quite a exciting as i had anticipated. the message i would take home is PD is a very common diseaese and there are many factors involved. we still dont know exactly what causes it as its pretty much all idiopathic but there are many things to learn form it. this prac allows you to think more laterally about strategies and try new things which can be very fulfilling.
Analysis and Planning
S
I was seeing a new pt and at the end of the session I had to write a detailed soapier in the notes. There is a staff changeover next week so the handovers must be detailed to give the supervising clinician a good understanding of what is expected during the next session. My analysis and plan for the problem list was the most important part of my notes.
T
In order to complete a successful handover, I had document a problem list (analysis) from my Ax which had to be specific and enclose all the pts problems. I then had to write a plan both for the next week and future planning for this pt that the next clinician could read off and understand clearly to go ahead with the Rx next week.
A
Once I was finished the initial session I wrote up a detailed A,P. I had to focus on including everything that was evident through my Ax. My Analysis appropriate and I wrote a plan for the next session in one week.
R
My analysis was not in order from the biggest problem to the smallest. Your problem list should be ordered so that the most important problem to be addressed is first and so on. My plan was only written for the next week. It should have been written for future planning. Then the next physio could have an idea for d/c planning and what the overall plan is.
E
I think my A and P were comprehensive in some respects but lacked in other ways. To look at it from the next physio’s point of view I don’t think it was quite good enough. My analysis was good except for the order and my plan needed a bit of work. My plan needed to address the analysis and have written for the next week and for overall Rx.
S
I think the best strategy is to look at it as if you were the physio seeing the pt next and ask yourself is this comprehensive in that I would feel confident going to see this pt with information on hand. Write out your A and P and then review it from an objective point of view.
I was seeing a new pt and at the end of the session I had to write a detailed soapier in the notes. There is a staff changeover next week so the handovers must be detailed to give the supervising clinician a good understanding of what is expected during the next session. My analysis and plan for the problem list was the most important part of my notes.
T
In order to complete a successful handover, I had document a problem list (analysis) from my Ax which had to be specific and enclose all the pts problems. I then had to write a plan both for the next week and future planning for this pt that the next clinician could read off and understand clearly to go ahead with the Rx next week.
A
Once I was finished the initial session I wrote up a detailed A,P. I had to focus on including everything that was evident through my Ax. My Analysis appropriate and I wrote a plan for the next session in one week.
R
My analysis was not in order from the biggest problem to the smallest. Your problem list should be ordered so that the most important problem to be addressed is first and so on. My plan was only written for the next week. It should have been written for future planning. Then the next physio could have an idea for d/c planning and what the overall plan is.
E
I think my A and P were comprehensive in some respects but lacked in other ways. To look at it from the next physio’s point of view I don’t think it was quite good enough. My analysis was good except for the order and my plan needed a bit of work. My plan needed to address the analysis and have written for the next week and for overall Rx.
S
I think the best strategy is to look at it as if you were the physio seeing the pt next and ask yourself is this comprehensive in that I would feel confident going to see this pt with information on hand. Write out your A and P and then review it from an objective point of view.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Communication
S:
Whether completing a baseline Ax to a pt you are seeing for the first time or providing ongoing Rx to a regular pt, communication is very important. In this particular scenario I was seeing a pt for the first time. He was a 65 yr old gentleman who had a speech and hearing deficit and had arrived for Physiotherapy regarding his Parkinson Disease (PD).
T:
In regards to communication my desired outcome was to Ax and Rx this pt using an appropriate level of communication taking into account any disabilities or cognitive deficits. This included everything from voice projection to tone and how much I explained the tasks we were about to do.
A:
Through reading his notes I realised that he has an inner ear device that accounted for his decreased hearing, however I wasn’t sure about cognition and speech. I spoke to him at a normal voice projection and in a tone that more reflected the way I would speak to an elderly pt with cognitive deficits.
R:
At the end of the Rx my supervisor provided feedback about my communication. My communication throughout the Ax and Rx was inappropriate. This gentleman would delay his response for a few seconds before answering any qn’s. This was not because of any cognitive deficits, but due to delayed processing of words due to his hearing impairment and the PD. I misinterpreted this delay as him not understanding me and hence adjusted my communication for someone with a cognitive deficit. This made me appear to be condescending towards the pt, which he could have found very offensive considering he was cognitively sound.
E:
Although my communication wasn’t effective I believe there were some things I did right and other I could have done better. I would prefer to over explain to a pt and be interpreted as condescending to under explain and not get the task completed. However I initially did not give the pt enough time to respond, which if I had, I would have realised he understood perfectly it just took him time to respond. Although I felt rather disappointed I did take the feedback on board and the next week I improved ten fold and as a result gained much more rapport with the pt.
S:
Firstly ask someone appropriate rather than just read the notes. Say to someone “I have read that this person has hearing and speech difficulties, what is the most effective way to communicate with this pt?” From the first introduction, start to think about how this person presents wholistically, including cognitively so that you communicate effectively form the word go.
Whether completing a baseline Ax to a pt you are seeing for the first time or providing ongoing Rx to a regular pt, communication is very important. In this particular scenario I was seeing a pt for the first time. He was a 65 yr old gentleman who had a speech and hearing deficit and had arrived for Physiotherapy regarding his Parkinson Disease (PD).
T:
In regards to communication my desired outcome was to Ax and Rx this pt using an appropriate level of communication taking into account any disabilities or cognitive deficits. This included everything from voice projection to tone and how much I explained the tasks we were about to do.
A:
Through reading his notes I realised that he has an inner ear device that accounted for his decreased hearing, however I wasn’t sure about cognition and speech. I spoke to him at a normal voice projection and in a tone that more reflected the way I would speak to an elderly pt with cognitive deficits.
R:
At the end of the Rx my supervisor provided feedback about my communication. My communication throughout the Ax and Rx was inappropriate. This gentleman would delay his response for a few seconds before answering any qn’s. This was not because of any cognitive deficits, but due to delayed processing of words due to his hearing impairment and the PD. I misinterpreted this delay as him not understanding me and hence adjusted my communication for someone with a cognitive deficit. This made me appear to be condescending towards the pt, which he could have found very offensive considering he was cognitively sound.
E:
Although my communication wasn’t effective I believe there were some things I did right and other I could have done better. I would prefer to over explain to a pt and be interpreted as condescending to under explain and not get the task completed. However I initially did not give the pt enough time to respond, which if I had, I would have realised he understood perfectly it just took him time to respond. Although I felt rather disappointed I did take the feedback on board and the next week I improved ten fold and as a result gained much more rapport with the pt.
S:
Firstly ask someone appropriate rather than just read the notes. Say to someone “I have read that this person has hearing and speech difficulties, what is the most effective way to communicate with this pt?” From the first introduction, start to think about how this person presents wholistically, including cognitively so that you communicate effectively form the word go.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)